

 |
Reduce the Red Arrows to 7 aircraft
I always assumed that all
my telephone calls were monitored: paranoia maybe, but it was a habit I had got
into
The week beginning 2 March 1998 was a very traumatic week for the Team. It began
with great expectations. The first nine-ship formation practice of the 1998
Season was expected to be flown sometime that week – weather permitting. On the
Tuesday afternoon just as Simon Meade was about to start the pre-flight briefing
for the final seven-aircraft sortie of the day, he was called by the Adjutant,
Warrant Officer John Howard, to talk to the Commander-in-Chief on the telephone.
That in itself was quite remarkable. It was very rare for the Boss to be summoned
during or immediately before a briefing. Only operational matters relevant to
the sortie about to be flown were allowed to interrupt briefings and even very
senior officers understood that. The Adjutant had explained to the
Commander-in-Chief's aide that a briefing was in progress but the aide insisted
that the Team Leader should come to the phone immediately.
It was a good 20 minutes before Simon returned, smiling disarmingly. He
continued with the briefing without saying anything to anyone about the
telephone call. It was infuriating and Simon knew full well that we were all
intensely interested to know what the Commander-in-Chief had wanted to say that
was so important that it could not wait until after the sortie. But Simon,
always the professional, was more concerned with the job in hand.
I was then away sick at home for two days and completely forgot about the incident. Late
on the Thursday the Manager, Squadron Leader Mike Williams, telephoned me at
home. He wanted to know if I would be fit enough to go to work on Friday because
the Boss had something to tell me that could not be discussed on the phone.
Although I was intrigued, I did not connect this summons with the
Commander-in-Chief's call to Simon earlier in the week. I said that I would be
there on the following day.
I started work on Friday morning at my usual time, just after 0600, and
got on with dealing with the ordinary mail and the e-mail that had accumulated
during my two-day absence. The time passed quickly as it always did early in the
morning and by the time Simon arrived at his usual time, about 0750, I had
almost forgotten that I'd been asked to come in especially so that he could
talk to me. He came into my office and closed the door. That was unusual – my
office door was rarely closed.
'The C-in-C told me on Tuesday that with immediate effect the team is to be
reduced from nine to seven,' Simon announced, without any preamble.
I was flabbergasted! 'That's ridiculous,' I said.
'The reason he gave,' continued Simon, with the little smile that I knew so well
hovering on his lips, 'is the shortage of Hawk airframes forecast for the next
year or so while the engineers get on with some major work involving the main
spar of all the Hawks. It seems the C-in-C has a difficulty with letting the Red
Arrows keep 13 Hawks while the flying training school at Valley is struggling to
keep their training throughput going.'
At that time the Team had, and needed, 13 Hawks on its inventory - the right
number to guarantee that the engineers could maintain 10 serviceable throughout
the display season.
'I told the C-in-C that we were about to fly our first nine ship practice on
Wednesday,' continued Simon. 'Of course, he understands how psychologically
important that is – especially for the FNGs. I asked him, in the interests of
good morale if nothing else, to let me at least fly the first nine. He agreed –
a bit reluctantly I think. I then asked if I could programme a nine-ship
practice for Thursday as well – just in case something cropped up to spoil the
Wednesday flight. He finally agreed to that as well.'
The Team had flown their first nine-ship of the season on the Wednesday and
another one the following day. Only after that did Simon tell his pilots of the
decision to reduce the Team. Thus, whatever else came to pass, the three
first-year pilots in the 1998 Team, Flight Lieutenants Andy Evans, Andy Lewis
and Ian Smith, had at least flown twice in a nine-ship formation.
'The C-in-C told me that he thought it was likely that a seven aircraft display
would continue for five years and after that it might be possible to revert to
nine.'
'I don't believe it,' I said. 'Once they reduce us to seven aircraft they'll
never allow us to go back to nine. There'll always be a reason to keep us at
seven.'
Simon seemed to think that someone at MoD might have already leaked the news to
the media but he would not be drawn and I never did get to the bottom of it. Had
someone told Simon to tell me that? Was it a veiled suggestion to me that I
should leak the news to the press? Surely not – they knew me better than that!
Simon merely said he wanted me to be ready with a suitable story in case the
media got in touch with me, and they surely would when the local spotters saw
the Team practising with seven aircraft again so soon after the first nine ship
sorties.
I racked my brains. What story could I put out? The idea of reducing the world
famous Red Arrows to a display with just seven aircraft was both humiliating and
extremely bad PR for the RAF – and for UK plc. It would reduce the Red Arrows to
a second-rate team in the eyes of professional aviators the world over. I
thought it highly unlikely that British Aerospace would wish to continue their
long association with the Team and that it was probable that there would be no
more overseas tours sponsored by British Industry. As for the suggestion that
the Team would be restored to nine aircraft a few years down stream – well
no-one, but no-one, would believe that.
'If you want my opinion,' I said to Simon after a few seconds thought, 'if the
RAF is really so desperately short of Hawk aircraft, I think the Team should be
disbanded altogether. At least that way the Red Arrows can go out on a high
note.'
'Give the matter some more thought,' said the Boss, rising to leave. 'I've got a
lot to do.'
Having spent years working in military intelligence, I always assumed that all
my telephone calls were monitored: paranoia maybe, but it was a habit I'd got
into. I frequently used to make joke comments in the middle of a telephone call
to colleagues such as, 'I'll just say that again slowly for the tape.' So, when
I spoke to John Turner, the Command Public Relations Officer, about half an hour
after Simon had broken the news to me, I did so in guarded terms. It immediately
became obvious, however, that John knew what I was talking about and that he had
already been involved in some sort of briefing at Command HQ. John's immediate
advice, when I mentioned a possible leak at MoD, was that we should deny any
knowledge of the matter – in other words I was to tell lies, something I had
never done in all my time as a PRO. I told him I was not at all happy with that
suggestion and he agreed to seek further advice.
The weather on that Friday morning was appalling, high winds, low cloud
and torrential rain. The aircraft remained in the hangar and Simon was able to
take time out to interview the three first year pilots individually and at some
length. The plan was for one of the new pilots to remain with the Team and
become the Team Manager, thereby allowing the posting of the pilot who had been
pre-selected for that post to be cancelled. I was not privy to the discussions
but I assume the Leader was discussing with them which two of the three should
leave if it came to that. It was hoped that two would be allowed to remain on
the Squadron doing odd jobs and then become the new pilots for the 1999 Team –
only two would have been
needed for 1999 anyway. That plot would, of course, mean that the 20-plus
applicants who had already been through part of the pre-selection procedure,
would all be told they had not been selected.
All things considered, the decision to reduce the Team could hardly have been
made at a more difficult time of year and
it appeared, not for the first time, that someone, somewhere, had it in
for the Red Arrows. On Friday afternoon of that dark and wintry week, John
Turner the Command PRO and I had another guarded conversation. John told me that the most senior
civil servant in the Command Secretariat, the group of civil servants that
advises the Commander-in-Chief, had decided that we PROs should not tell
outright lies. That was very decent of him, I thought! The senior civil servant
thought that, if questioned, I should say something on the lines of, 'Yes, I
have heard the story about the Red Arrows reducing from nine to seven aircraft
but I'm unable to confirm or deny it since decisions of that nature rest with
Ministers.' To my mind that was a lengthy way of saying 'no comment' and passing
the buck. I told John that I preferred not to refer to Ministers – they were the
prerogative of the Ministry of Defence PROs not one at station level.
Eventually
it was agreed that, if asked about the reduction, I would say that I had heard
the story and that I was waiting for further information from our HQ. John and I
both knew that if reporters got wind of the story from any source, they would
telephone both of us and the Ministry of Defence Press Office to check if we
were all putting out the same line. It was all part of the PR game.
Some time on that same busy Friday afternoon a rumour started going around
Cranwell which postulated that the whole story about the Red Arrows having to
reduce to seven aircraft had been invented to test reactions to the idea within
the RAF and amongst the general public. It was even suggested that 'they'
actually wanted the story to be leaked to the media to achieve that very aim. A
concurrent variant on this rumour said that the decision to reduce to seven had
been taken by the full Air Force Board but the air marshals wanted the
announcement to be made by the Minister for the Armed Forces, thereby absolving
the Air Force Board of all blame! Intriguing thought. What gave rise to those
rumours? No-one outside the Red Arrows was supposed even to know that the
reduction was being planned. Simon Meade asked me to keep him informed of any
media enquiries or other developments over the weekend.Back to the top |