








 |
Western Rangers
A very popular series of flights for the Victor Tankers when I was based at
Marham in the 1970s were known as Western
Rangers. A Western Ranger involved 2 tankers and a typical itinerary went like
this:
| |
|
Route |
Typical
flt time |
| Friday |
Tanker 1 |
Marham direct Goose Bay Labrador |
5 hrs |
| Monday |
Tanker 2 |
Marham direct Offutt AFB Nebraska, refuelling overhead Goose Bay |
10-11 hrs |
| Tanker 1 |
Goose Bay - refuel Tanker 2 - land Goose Bay |
1.5 hrs |
| Tuesday |
Tanker 1 |
Goose Bay to Offutt AFB |
3.5 hrs |
| Tanker 2 |
Day off in Omaha/Offutt |
|
| Wednesday |
Tanker 2 |
Offutt to Goose Bay |
3.5 hrs |
| Tanker 1 |
Day off in Omaha/Offutt |
|
| Friday |
Tanker 1 |
Offutt AFB direct Marham, refuelling overhead Goose Bay |
09-10 hrs |
| Friday |
Tanker 2 |
Goose Bay - refuel Tanker 1 - land Goose Bay |
1.5 hrs |
| Monday |
Tanker 2 |
Goose Bay to Marham |
5 hrs |
Actual flight times, of course, depended on the high level winds, generally
flowing from west to east across the North Atlantic and frequently well
exceeding 100 knots.
The idea of the Western Rangers was to give tanker crews an opportunity to
operate independently away from base, and a chance to visit Strategic Air
Command HQ at Omaha. Timings, by both aircraft, were critical because the tanker transferring fuel
overhead Goose Bay had to take off at a precise time which would enable it to
climb to the operating height, usually about 30,000 feet depending on upper
cloud conditions, to be at the RV exactly on time - pointing in the right
direction (as shown in the two black and white images below). In those days the
RV had to be completed by the hard work of the navigators - the civilian Air Traffic Controllers
would not, or could not, assist. We used to joke that ATC would not help achieve
the RV since their task was to keep aircraft apart not bring them into close
proximity; there was, of course, truth in that!
The tanker on the direct flight, in either direction, typically received 40,000 lbs
(roughly 20 old-fashioned tons) of
fuel in 22-25 minutes, during which time its own engines used up about 6-8000lbs
of fuel so the net gain was about 33,000lbs. The Flight Refuelling Operator in
the tanker (one of the two navigators) had the fuel gauges which measured
accurately the amount of fuel which flowed from tanker to receiver. Maximum
transfers, as they were called, were always tiring for the
receiving tanker's Captain/1st Pilot because he had to fly the aircraft
manually, one hand holding the control column and the other hand operating the
four engine throttles together. The auto-pilot could not be used by the receiver
because it did not have the sensitivity to make the necessary continuous small
corrections and, let's face it, the Victor K1's auto-pilot, with its 1950s
technology, was not totally reliable.
Slight digression. The Captain was not always the 1st pilot (defined as the
pilot in the left hand seat) because sometimes a suitably qualified captain flew
in the right hand seat when he was training a co-pilot to operate from the left
hand seat. However, captains were the only ones authorised to take on fuel from
a tanker so such captains had to be able to carry out maximum on-loads from
either seat and in that respect they had to be ambidextrous. When I was OC
the Victor Standardisation Unit I sometimes allowed selected co-pilots to make
contact with a tanker without any fuel transfer taking place; it was good for their morale (if they did it well!) but
not good for the morale of the rear crew members. On those occasions, definitely
not Western Rangers, if the co-pilot started to lose control I simply extended
the air brakes and closed the throttles allowing the aircraft to drop back and
make a speedy disconnect from the tanker.
Pilots reading this will readily appreciate, but non-aircrew often do not, that
the weight of both aircraft changes significantly during this long transfer of
fuel. Obviously the tanker gets lighter and its pilot has to reduce power to
maintain a constant speed, while the receiver gets steadily heavier and its pilot has to increase power
to maintain speed. Towards the end of the transfer
a Victor K1 receiver required almost the maximum permitted power setting on all four
engines to remain in position without dropping back and breaking contact. The co-pilot was responsible for
making sure the fuel flowing into the receiver was pumped into appropriate
tanks, in so doing aiming to keep the aircraft's centre of gravity within
allowable limits. Sometimes the receiving Victor would find that it was
impossible to remain in position at maximum permitted power. In these
circumstances the receiver would request a manoeuvre known as 'toboggan'.
Subject to ATC clearance the two aircraft would gently enter a very slow
descent thereby allowing gravity to take over allowing both aircraft to reduce
power slightly. 'Gently' was the keyword. Both aircraft had to start descending
at exactly the same time and at the same rate otherwise contact would be broken.
A rate of descent of 300 feet per minute was usually sufficient.
Goose Bay airfield, 53 degrees 19 minutes North, 60 degrees 25 minutes West, was jointly operated
at this time by the Royal Canadian Air Force and United States Air Force. The USAF
operated their Strategic Air Command B52s nuclear heavy bombers from a vast
dispersed site on the base. The B52s were
held on permanent readiness, as they were throughout the Cold War, to counter any
Soviet nuclear attack coming over the North Pole. Fortunately that contingency never came about although
the B52s carried out frequent exercises to test their readiness. The RAF had a
small permanent detachment at Goose Bay to assist the Victor tanker crews and other Bomber Command
aircraft that used to operate in Canada and USA.. During the long arctic winter
the only way into and out of the Goose Bay area was by air.
I took the pictures in the block below, except the first two, on 17
and 18 March 1973, when the Spring thaw in Labrador was just starting. On
this occasion my crew was operating as Tanker 2. Click on a thumbnail to
download a larger version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tanker waiting for its receiver to move into position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and receiver about to start the refuelling procedure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approaching Goose Bay, seen from the co-pilot's seat of XA936 while I did the hard work |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XA936 outside Goose after arrival from Offutt AFB. In winter, the aircraft was moved inside the hanagar as quickly as possible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XA936 in the warm in the Goose Bay hangar. During winter all checks up to engine start were done inside the hangar to stop things freezing up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The local church in Happy Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My co-pilot posing outside the 'supermarket' in Happy Valley, the local town - the only town. It had an amazing selection of goods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main road, and gate guardian, outside the RCAF Goose Bay airbase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another general view of the locality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The officers' living quarters - still snowbound in March |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another view of Happy Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fun travel in the snow - residents as well as military personnel used these snomobiles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bargaining between ship's crew and locals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of the ships that had over-wintered in the bay - complete with their crew |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main road between Happy Valley and air base |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was not clear whther or not they intended to remain all winter - but remain they did! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This one did not even make the quayside when the first ice came |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|